Cases 1 - 10 of 25
KOKINDA v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2016cv01457
Plaintiff:
JASON KOKINDA
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PILLAI, CHRISTOPHER H. OPPMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KOKINDA v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2016cv01303
Plaintiff:
JASON KOKINDA
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BYUNGHAK JIN, CHRISTOPHER H. OPPMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PATTERSON v. PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv00659
Plaintiff:
RICKY M. PATTERSON
Defendant:
PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC., MARY COMER and BYUNGHAK JIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
KOKINDA v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2015cv01593
Plaintiff:
JASON KOKINDA
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MICHELE HOWARD DIGGS, CHRISTOPHER H. OPPMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KOKINDA v. JIN et al
as 2:2015cv00179
Plaintiff:
JASON KOKINDA
Defendant:
BYUNGHAK JIN, MICHELLE DIGGS, IRMA VIHLIDAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. OVERMYER et al
as 1:2014cv00200
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DAVIS
Defendant:
MICHAEL OVERMYER, MURIN, MONGELLUZZO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FORREST v. SAUERS et al
as 1:2012cv00319
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FORREST
Defendant:
DEBRA K. SAUERS, MAURIN, JOHN DOE 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SPENCER v. PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2012cv00062
Plaintiff:
RAVANNA SPENCER
Defendant:
PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC., TONLAY and MAXINE OVERTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOOVER v. CAMERON et al
as 3:2011cv00261
Petitioner:
HARRY HOOVER
Respondent:
KENNETH CAMERON and PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WASHINGTON v. FOLINO et al
as 2:2011cv01046
Plaintiff:
HENRY UNSELD WASHINGTON
Defendant:
LOUIS S. FOLINO, BYUNGHAK JIN, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
