Cases filed in the US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00592
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
GINDRAW v. SANFORD et al
as 3:2024cv00065
Plaintiff: TAHMIR GINDRAW
Defendant: LT. SANFORD and LT. HOUSTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. SANFORD et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00003
Plaintiff: THERMAN D. SMITH, JR.
Defendant: LIEUTENANT SANFORD, OFFICER RAGER, OFFICER ATES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLEN v. SANFORD et al
as 2:2021cv00899
Plaintiff: ROGER ALLEN
Defendant: LT. SANFORD and LT. NELSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
ALLEN v. SANFORD et al
as 3:2021cv00120
Plaintiff: ROGER ALLEN
Defendant: LT. SANFORD and LT. NELSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
KLEIN et al v. DWALDMANLAW.P.C.
as 2:2018cv00650
Plaintiff: HAL SANFORD KLEIN and JEANNE DENISE KLEIN
Defendant: DWALDMANLAW, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
BOZICK v. SANFORD
as 2:2015cv01687
Plaintiff: HELEN BOZICK
Defendant: DAVID SANFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. THE PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00587
Petitioner: SANFORD WAYNE DAVIS
Respondent: THE PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and PAROLE BOARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SANFORD v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv00057
Plaintiff: ANDRE SANFORD
Defendant: PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GUZMAN v. ROZUM et al
as 3:2013cv00255
Petitioner: FRANCISCO GUZMAN
Respondent: GERALD L. ROZUM, GARY SANFORD and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?