Cases 1 - 10 of 77
TAYLOR v. NUNEZ et al
as 2:2024cv01188
Defendant:
LARRY SHAW, MARK BROTHERS, LESLIE BRADLEY and others
Plaintiff:
DANE D. TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
DOE v. ODDO et al
as 3:2024cv00147
Defendant:
JOE GIGLIOTTI, R. BRAINIFF, ROSS and others
Plaintiff:
MS. JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
DOE v. ODDO et al
as 3:2024cv00144
Defendant:
R. BOLLINGER, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, R.A. SETH JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
JEAN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS-EL v. ADAMS et al
as 2:2024cv00813
Defendant:
DOUGLAS SAMPLE, KELLY J. ROBERTSON, DEREK ARTIM and others
Plaintiff:
BRANDON DAVIS-EL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SHAW v. MARKS et al
as 2:2024cv00706
Plaintiff:
ARIES SHAW
Defendant:
AARON M. MARKS, JOEY D BRANT, CORPORAL MARIACHER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
MCCANN v. PRIME CARE et al
as 3:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
LONNIE MCCANN
Defendant:
PRIME CARE, CHRISTIAN SMITH, MR. DECALVISH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SHAW v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Shaw
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
MCCANN v. CHERNISKY et al
as 3:2023cv00308
Plaintiff:
LONNIE MCCANN
Defendant:
THOMAS C. CHERNISKY, WARDEN SMITH, CAPTAIN WOLFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SHAW v. COUNTY OF FAYETTE EMPLOYEES et al
as 2:2023cv01954
Plaintiff:
JADEN SHAW
Defendant:
COUNTY OF FAYETTE EMPLOYEES, CLYDE BRANSON, JOHN LANKY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
KENDRICK v. SHAW
as 2:2022cv01805
Plaintiff:
PAUL KENDRICK
Defendant:
C.O. SHAW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
