Cases 1 - 10 of 22
MARTINEZ v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2024cv00281
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN JUAN DE LA CRUZ MARTINEZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MARTINEZ v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2024cv00282
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN JUAN DE LA CRUZ MARTINEZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BANKS v. ROE et al
as 2:2019cv00303
Defendant:
ADRIAN ROE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA, MIKE POMPEO and others
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
JACKSON v. DUNKEN DONUTS et al
as 2:2018cv00766
Plaintiff:
JOHN JERMAINE JACKSON
Defendant:
DUNKEN DONUTS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA and SIXTH PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BANKS v. ROE et al
as 2:2017mc00672
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
ADRIAN ROE, MARK R. HORNAK, ROBERT CESARE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. COCAS et al
as 2:2017mc00673
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
DONOVAN COCAS, ADRIAN N. ROE, MCKEE and others
BANKS v. SONG et al
as 2:2017mc00671
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
SOO SONG, ROBERT CESSAR, MARK R. HORNAK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BANKS v. SONG, et al
as 2:2017mc00670
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
SOO SONG, ROBERT CESSAR, MARK R. HORNAK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. ROE et al
as 2:2017mc00619
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
ADRIAN ROE, MARK R. HORNAK, ROBERT CESSAR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BANKS v ROE et al
as 2:2017mc00620
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
ADRIAN ROE, MARK R. HORNAK, J. ROBERT CESSAR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
