Cases 1 - 10 of 37
CRESSWELL v. ACKER et al
as 2:2024cv00646
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH PAUL CRESSWELL
Defendant:
PETER C. ACKER, TIM McGONICAL, DANIEL P. WALLACE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY v. BARBER et al
as 2:2023cv02123
Plaintiff:
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
Defendant:
LAWRENCE WILLIAM BARBER and JOSEPHINE BARBER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BARBER v. CUNA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 1:2021cv00327
Plaintiff:
DONNA BARBER
Defendant:
CUNA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, CMFG LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and CUNA MUTUAL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SATURNO, LLC v. ERIE INSURANCE EXCHANGE
as 1:2021cv00072
Plaintiff:
SATURNO, LLC. doing business as Modern Male Barber Shop
Defendant:
ERIE INSURANCE EXCHANGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SATURNO, LLC D/B/A MODERN MALE BARBER SHOP v. ERIE INSURANCE EXCHANGE
as 1:2021cv00172
Defendant:
ERIE INSURANCE EXCHANGE
Plaintiff:
SATURNO, LLC D/B/A MODERN MALE BARBER SHOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FILBERT v. ZAPPALA et al
as 2:2020cv01858
Defendant:
LINDA COHEN, JOY FLOWERS CONTI, MARGRET PICKENS and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH R. FILBERT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCALL v. KANE et al
as 2:2020cv00924
Defendant:
DEBORAH KANE, JUANITA BARBER, GREGORY NANNY and others
Plaintiff:
DAIJON MCCALL
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
BARBER v. MURARIK et al
as 3:2020cv00068
Defendant:
JEFFREY MURARIK, CHARLES PITTSINGER and LEONARD CHERNISKY
Plaintiff:
RAQUIEN BARBER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MCCALL v. KANE et al
as 2:2020cv00287
Defendant:
JUANITA BARBER, MARLEA J. APPLEGATE, DEBORAH KANE and others
Plaintiff:
DAIJON MCCALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
