Cases 1 - 10 of 10
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. TUTTLE
as 2:2020cv01645
Defendant:
BARBARA L. TUTTLE
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1471
KOLLOCK v. BEEMER et al
as 3:2019cv00096
Defendant:
ALAN ROBINSON, THERON R. PEREZ, JOHN E. TUTTLE and others
Plaintiff:
JASON P. KOLLOCK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
KOLLOCK v. BEEMER et al
as 3:2018cv00208
Respondent:
JOHN E. TUTTLE, ALAN ROBINSON, JOHN E. WETZEL and others
Petitioner:
JASON P. KOLLOCK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CLARK v. TORMA et al
as 3:2016cv00084
Petitioner:
MICHELLE LEMARIE CLARK
Respondent:
JOANNE TORMA, JOHN TUTTLE and PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HIRT v. TORMA et al
as 1:2016cv00024
Petitioner:
SAMANTHA HIRT
Respondent:
JOANNE TORMA, JOHN TUTTLE and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MAYON v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2015cv01003
Plaintiff:
MICKY MAYON
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, MARK CAPPOZZA, COLIN FISCHETTI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RHODES v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 1:2015cv00006
Petitioner:
TERI ANNE RHODES
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and JOHN TUTTLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TUTTLE v. WINGARD, et al
as 2:2014cv00164
Plaintiff:
GREGORY TUTTLE and CONNIE TUTTLE
Defendant:
TREVOR WINGARD , DANA PHILLIPS , VIRGINIA COOK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROTHERS v. CORBETT et al
as 2:2013cv01154
Plaintiff:
WILLIAMS B. BROTHERS, JR.
Defendant:
TOM CORBETT, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ARMSTRONG et al v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2010cv01246
Plaintiff:
GALEN ARMSTRONG , TIM BARTHELMES , MATT BARTKO and others
Defendant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH, NATHAN HARPER, PAUL DONALDSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
