Cases 1 - 10 of 220
FANN v. HARRY et al
as 2:2024cv00766
Plaintiff:
GREGORY D. FANN, Jr.
Defendant:
Dr LAUREL R. HARRY, ERIC ARMEL, TINA WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
TALBERT v. IRWIN et al
as 2:2024cv00675
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Defendant:
RANDY IRWIN, JOHN BLICHA, IAN GUSTAFSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
TALBERT v. IRWIN et al
as 1:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Defendant:
RANDY IRWIN, JOHN BLICHA, IAN GUSTAFSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
v. STOCKTON et al
as 2:2024cv00564
Defendant:
RONALD STOCKTON, LAUREL HARRY, RANDY IRWIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
STOCKTON v. HARRY et al
as 1:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
RONALD STOCKTON
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, RANDY IRWIN, DEPUTY M-BLICHA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00542
Plaintiff:
Sebastian Dayton Walker
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
SCULLEN v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00522
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SCULLEN
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GEORGE LITTLE, SECRETARY DR. HARRY LAUREL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
McDONALD v. MARSH et al
as 1:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
JOHN MAURICE McDONALD
Defendant:
ROBERT MARSH, SUPERINTENDENT RANDY IRWIN, MAJOR DEAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. WALKER et al
as 2:2024cv00484
Plaintiff:
SHAWN KING
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT TINA WALKER, MR. MATIYASIC, RHONDA HOUSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
CONWAY v. IRWIN et al
as 1:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER CONWAY
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT RANDY IRWIN, CO- MOWREY, CO MOWREY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
