Cases 1 - 10 of 105
MYERS v. CLEVELAND-CLIFFS et al
as 2:2024cv00684
Defendant:
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS, UAW - UNITED AUTO WORKERS, AK STEEL and others
Plaintiff:
JOE MYERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
TOLON et al v. BGC 135 9TH STREET INC.
as 2:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
CHEYENNE TOLON and TAYLOR MYERS
Defendant:
BGC 135 9th STREET INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
WILLIAMS v. ENGLISH et al
as 3:2023cv00244
Plaintiff:
JOHN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
ENGLISH, CAPTAIN MOONEY, SINCLAIR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00191
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
GREGORY v. NUNEZ et al
as 3:2023cv00137
Plaintiff:
RODERICK GREGORY
Defendant:
Hearing Examiner FREDDY NUNEZ, C.O. MYERS, C.O. PATRICK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
RECESKI v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 2:2023cv00883
Plaintiff:
JANELLE RECESKI
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY and CELGENE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Civil Rights: Other
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00083
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
WERNER v. POBORSKY et al
as 3:2023cv00039
Plaintiff:
DANIEL WERNER
Defendant:
SGT. POBORSKY, BRITTANY, JACOBS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
CRAVENER v. MCCLISTER et al
as 2:2023cv00355
Plaintiff:
ROBERT D. CRAVENER, SR.
Defendant:
JUDGE CHASE MCCLISTER, ASST DISTRICT ATTORN REBECCA LOZZI, WARDEN JESSICA HICKS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
ROTEN v. LITTLE et al
as 2:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
ISIAH ANDREW ROTEN
Defendant:
GEORGE LITTLE, TABB BICKELL, MICHAEL ZAKEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
