Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Ashbrook v Meigs County, Tennessee
as 1:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Hannah Ashbrook
Defendant:
Meigs County, TN, State of Tennessee, Attorney Casey Stokes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Arwood et al v. Hamblen County Jail et al
as 2:2023cv00044
Plaintiff:
Karen Arwood and Raymond Arwood
Defendant:
Hamblen County Jail, Esco Jarnagin, Teresa Laws and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christian v. Kingsport Police Department
as 2:2021cv00192
Plaintiff:
David Christian
Defendant:
Kingsport Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grace Christian Academy of Knoxville, LLC v. Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Association et al
as 3:2021cv00042
Defendant:
Art Cook, Keith Turner, Greg Wyant and others
Plaintiff:
Grace Christian Academy of Knoxville, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ledford v. Knox County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2020cv00325
Defendant:
Tom Spangler, John Doe I-X, Corey Campbell and others
Plaintiff:
Ann Ledford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Post et al v. Hampton et al (PLR1)
as 1:2019cv00232
Plaintiff:
Christian Heatherly and Paige Post
Defendant:
McMinn county, Deputy Lieutenant Tony Parsons, Sheriff Joe Guy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Knox County et al (TWP1)
as 3:2019cv00074
Defendant:
Christian Gomez, Knox County, John/Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Ralph Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00059
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00048
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Branch v. Knox County et al
as 3:2017cv00380
Defendant:
Knox County, Paul Saah and Christian Gomez
Plaintiff:
Paul Branch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
