Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Bowman v. Hankins et al
as 3:2015cv00287
Plaintiff:
Kevin Bowman
Defendant:
Pat Hankins and Judge Matthis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rattan v. Rattan et al (PLR1)
as 3:2015cv00088
Plaintiff:
Arun Rattan
Defendant:
Shailja Rattan, Bill Swan, Elected Clerk and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hatcher v. Deputy Brollen et al
as 2:2014cv00204
Plaintiff:
Shamsiddeen Isiah Hatcher
Defendant:
Deputy Brollen, Lieutenant Mowdy, Sheriff Wayne Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White et al v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2014cv00115
Plaintiff:
Danielle M White, John No. 1 Doe and John No. 2 Doe
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Steve Burns, Tennessee Correctional Institute and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2014cv00116
Petitioner:
Danielle M White
Respondent:
State of Tennessee, Steve Burns, Tennessee Corrections Institute and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Timbs v. Public Defender's Office et al
as 2:2011cv00373
Plaintiff:
Edward T Timbs
Defendant:
Public Defender's Office, General Sessions Court, Carter County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lollis et al v. Harris et al
as 1:2011cv00244
Plaintiff:
Kentrail Lollis
Defendant:
Judge Harris and Natae Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. Montgomery et al
as 2:2011cv00245
Plaintiff:
Monolito B Cooper
Defendant:
Judge Montgomery and Tennessee, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDonald v. Sullivan County Jail et al
as 2:2008cv00280
Plaintiff:
Danny McDonald
Defendant:
Sullivan County Jail, Officer Ramsey, Officer Meade and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Leonard v. Oliver White Trust et al
as 3:2007cv00054
Plaintiff:
Jackie Leonard
Defendant:
Oliver White Trust, John Does, Dynasty Enterprises and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
