Cases 21 - 30 of 50
March v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 3:2017cv00189
Plaintiff:
Perry Avram March
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation, Aramark Correction Services, LLC, Tennessee Department of Correction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smiley v. The State of Tennessee et al
as 1:2016cv00469
Plaintiff:
Bruce A Smiley
Defendant:
The State of Tennessee, Tennessee Rehabiliative Initiatives in Correction, Veit Spero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale v. State of Tennessee et al
as 1:2016cv00422
Plaintiff:
Thomas Daniel Eugene Hale
Defendant:
Tennessee State of, Bert Boyd, Darren L. Settles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kabbash v. The Jewelry Channel, Inc. USA (TV2)
as 3:2016mc00042
Petitioner:
Greg Coleman Law PC
Defendant:
The Jewelry Channel, Inc. USA and The Jewelry Channel, Inc. USA doing business as Liquidation Channel
Plaintiff:
Lianna Kabbash
Gott v. FCI Coleman Medium et al
as 1:2016cv00029
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Gott
Defendant:
FCI Coleman Medium, Nurse Seda, Mrs. Buggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gott v. FCI Coleman Medium et al
as 1:2016mc00003
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Gott
Defendant:
FCI Coleman Medium, Nurse Seda, Mrs. Buggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. USA
as 2:2015cv00326
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Curtis Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Coleman v. Guy et al
as 1:2015cv00077
Plaintiff:
Timothy Coleman
Defendant:
Buckner, Bivens and Travis Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00425
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Henderson et al v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. et al
as 1:2014cv00269
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Virgil L. Henderson , Devonte Coleman and Kenwin Hunte
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
