Cases 21 - 30 of 89
Rollins v. Zhejiang Huahai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. et al
as 4:2019cv00048
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Torrent Private Limited, Express Scripts Holding Company and others
Plaintiff:
Clyde Rollins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carpenter v. Sexton et al
as 3:2019cv00221
Plaintiff:
Casey Carpenter
Defendant:
Kentucky Department of Corrections, Don Bryant, Tennessee Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryant v. Southern Health Partners et al
as 3:2019cv00187
Defendant:
Claiborne Co. Jail and Administration, Southern Health Partners and Claiborne County
Plaintiff:
Robert D Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryant v. Claiborne County Jail
as 3:2019cv00109
Defendant:
Claiborne County Jail
Plaintiff:
Robert D Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owens v. Ray et al
as 3:2018cv00408
Plaintiff:
James H Owens, Jr
Defendant:
Rhonda Venable, Don Bryant and David Ray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anculle et al v. United States of America
as 3:2018cv00308
Plaintiff:
Anna M. Kraujalis, Priscilla A. Blackburn, Malibu K. Messer and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Bryant v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (JRG3)
as 2:2018cv00072
Plaintiff:
Shauna Cheri Bryant
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
McPeters v. Parker et al
as 3:2018cv00039
Plaintiff:
April Diane McPeters
Defendant:
Tony C Parker, Alisha Shoates James, David Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunt v. Bledsoe County Correctional Complex ("BCCX")
as 1:2017cv00274
Plaintiff:
Bryant M. Hunt
Defendant:
Bledsoe County Correctional Complex ("BCCX")
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Machoka v. City of Collegedale et al (TV2)
as 1:2017cv00203
Plaintiff:
David B Machoka and Agnes K Machoka
Defendant:
City of Collegedale, Kat Cooper, Jacinta Terry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
