Cases 31 - 40 of 57
Goins v. Goins et al
as 2:2015cv00240
Plaintiff:
Paul Edward Goins
Defendant:
Robbie Goins, Eric Jones and Randy Comer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leffew v. Goins et al
as 2:2015cv00236
Plaintiff:
Roger A Leffew
Defendant:
Robbie Goins, Eric Jones and Randy Comer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKay v. Goins et al
as 1:2015cv00224
Plaintiff:
Martin S. McKay
Defendant:
Mark Goins , Tre Hargett and Kerry B. Steelman
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 437
Meberg et al v. Goins, Rash & Cain, Inc. (JRG2)
as 2:2015cv00156
Plaintiff:
Mark Meberg and Dove Construction, LLC
Defendant:
Goins, Rash & Cain, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Spakes et al v. National Strategic Protective Services, LLC (TV3)
as 3:2014cv00365
Plaintiff:
Tommy Spakes , Alvin Arnwine , Daniel Barnes and others
Defendant:
National Strategic Protective Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
State of Tennessee et al v. Haslam et al
as 3:2014cv00353
Plaintiff:
State of Tennessee and Herbert S. Moncier
Defendant:
Bill Haslam , Mark Goins , Robert E. Cooper, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Spakes et al v. G4S Government Solutions, Inc.
as 3:2014cv00349
Plaintiff:
Tommy Spakes , Alvin Arnwine , Daniel Barnes and others
Defendant:
G4S Government Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Norris v. Aryers et al (ASH)
as 3:2014cv00302
Plaintiff:
James F Norris
Defendant:
Franklin Aryers, Robbie Goins, Campbell County Detention Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moncier v. Haslam et al (TV1)
as 3:2013cv00630
Plaintiff:
Herbert S. Moncier
Defendant:
Bill Haslam and Mark Goins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Higdon v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2013cv00586
Plaintiff:
James T Higdon
Defendant:
State of Tennessee , District Attorney's Office for the Eighth District , William Paul Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
