Cases 31 - 40 of 59
Underwood v. Schofield et al
as 3:2015cv00533
Plaintiff:
Xavion L Underwood
Defendant:
Derrick Schofield, David Sexton, S Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Murray v. Williams et al (TV3)
as 3:2015cv00284
Plaintiff:
Loretta Murray, Billy Dean Murray, Bobby Dean Murray and others
Defendant:
Frank Williams, Roane County Chancellor, Denise Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 1:2015cv00126
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of, US Attorney and Attorney General of the U.S.
Plaintiff:
Jeffery C. Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Acuff et al v. G4S Government Solutions, Inc.
as 3:2014cv00337
Plaintiff:
Bryan Acuff , Gabriel Archer , Michael Ashe and others
Defendant:
G4S Government Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00317
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
King v. USA
as 3:2014cv00277
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Murphy Joey King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Murphy et al v. Allstate Indemnity Company
as 1:2013cv00108
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Murphy and Renee Ford
Defendant:
Allstate Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
The Lane Construction Corporation v. Taylor and Murphy Construction Company, Inc
as 3:2013cv00167
Plaintiff:
The Lane Construction Corporation
Defendant:
Taylor and Murphy Construction Company, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Murphy v. Nathan & Nathan, P.C.
as 2:2012cv00487
Plaintiff:
Ellis C Murphy
Defendant:
Nathan & Nathan, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
