Cases 41 - 50 of 69
Shelton v. Imperial Distributors, Inc.
as 1:2013cv00150
Plaintiff:
Daniel Shelton
Defendant:
Imperial Distributors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Ansley et al v. Erhart et al
as 3:2013cv00190
Plaintiff:
Brenda Bell , Caroline Best , Betty Coleman and others
Defendant:
Steven C Erhart , Larry Kelley , Charles G. Spencer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Neely v. Shinn
as 1:2012cv00357
Plaintiff:
Bobby Gene Neely, Jr.
Defendant:
David L. Shinn, Jr., Sherry Shelton and Thomas W Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Headden et al v. City of Chattanooga et al
as 1:2012cv00269
Plaintiff:
James Phillip Headden , Doug Stone , Robert Evans and others
Defendant:
City of Chattanooga , Ron Littlefield , Chattanooga Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Graves v. Schofield et al
as 2:2012cv00238
Plaintiff:
Maresse Graves
Defendant:
Derrick Schofield, David Sexton, Vicki Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neely v. State of Tennessee et al
as 1:2012cv00107
Plaintiff:
Bobby Gene Neely, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Thomas W Graham, Sherri Shelton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yokel et al v. Shelton (TV1)
as 3:2012mc00010
Petitioner:
Monty D Yokel and Ken Yokel
Respondent:
D. Stanley Shelton
Shelton v. Gault Financial, LLC et al
as 3:2012cv00081
Plaintiff:
Brandon Shelton
Defendant:
Gault Financial, LLC , Steven D Harb and Thompson & Booth, PC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Shelton v. Encore Capital Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00023
Plaintiff:
Alice Shelton
Defendant:
Encore Capital Group, Inc., Midland Funding, LLC , Midland Credit Management, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Yokel et al v. Shelton
as 3:2011mc00015
Petitioner:
Monty D Yokel and Ken Yokel
Respondent:
D. Stanley Shelton
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
