Cases 61 - 70 of 98
Lee v. Starnes et al
as 1:2013cv00226
Plaintiff:
Darren D. Lee
Defendant:
Gary Starnes, Jim Hammond, Alan Branum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gibbs v. Steelman et al
as 1:2013cv00203
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Gibbs, Jr.
Defendant:
Barry Steelman, Hamilton County, Hamilton County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibbs v. Steelman et al
as 2:2013cv00139
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Gibbs, Jr.
Defendant:
Barry Steelman, Hamilton County, Hamilton County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DePinto v. Hammond et al
as 1:2013cv00155
Plaintiff:
Frank DePinto
Defendant:
Jim Hammond, Chief Fusion, Hamilton County Sheriffs Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Grogg v. Beck et al
as 2:2013cv00129
Plaintiff:
Audie M Grogg
Defendant:
Jerry Beck, Barry Staubus, Randy Light and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ory v. Hamilton County, Tennessee et al
as 1:2013cv00110
Plaintiff:
Shannon Ory
Defendant:
Hamilton County, Tennessee, Hamilton County Sheriff's Office, Sheriff Jim Hammond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Hamilton County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2013cv00025
Plaintiff:
James Douglas Smith
Defendant:
Hamilton County Sheriff's Office, Mike Hammonds, Kight and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Dorsey v. Bruce et al
as 1:2012cv00405
Plaintiff:
Al Dorsey
Defendant:
Bruce, Pursley, Carpenter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Gibbs v. Haslam et al
as 1:2012cv00364
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Gibbs, Jr.
Defendant:
Bill Haslam, Jim Hammonds, M Monzon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. Hammond et al
as 1:2012cv00268
Plaintiff:
Thomas L Hughes, Jr
Defendant:
Jim Hammond and John Julian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
