Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Cases 61 - 70 of 160
Hyatt v. White et al
as 2:2014cv00293
Plaintiff: Bradley C. Hyatt
Defendant: Patrick L. White and Jonathan R. King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gambrel et al v. Auto Owners Insurance et al (PLR1)
as 3:2014cv00407
Defendant: Auto Owners Insurance and Charles C King
Plaintiff: Boyd Gambrel and Delphia Gambrel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00249
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Nichols v. Stanley et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2014cv00054
Plaintiff: Clayton Owen Nichols
Defendant: Larry Bart Stanley, Brad C. Price, Richard A. Dorris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nichols v. Stanley et al
as 4:2014cv00054
Plaintiff: Clayton Nichols
Defendant: Larry Bart Stanley, Brad C. Price, Richard A. Dorris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Amedisys Holding, LLC
as 1:2014cv00211
Plaintiff: Frances King
Defendant: Amedisys Holding, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Byers et al v. Hargis et al
as 4:2014cv00043
Plaintiff: Dennis Byers , Clarence T. Birdwell , Leslie Brent King and others
Defendant: Hubert Hargis , Grundy County, Tennessee Highway Department and Grundy County, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. USA
as 3:2014cv00277
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Murphy Joey King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
McDonalds et al v. Burger king Worldwide, Inc. et al.
as 1:2014mc00001
Plaintiff: Stiviano McDonalds and Hernandez Morales
Defendant: Burger king Worldwide, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00138
In_re: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Movant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Type: Bankruptcy Appeal

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?