Cases 71 - 80 of 96
Presley v. Coffee County, Tennessee et al
as 4:2010cv00077
Plaintiff:
Alton Lee Presley
Defendant:
Coffee County, Tennessee, Stephen M Graves, Pam Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bean et al v. Teague et al
as 3:2010cv00440
Plaintiff:
Robert Bean , Jacquleen Axley , Carl S Bivins and others
Defendant:
Steve Teague and Monroe County, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. USA
as 1:2010cv00131
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Brandon K Freeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Freeman v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc et al
as 1:2009cv00324
Plaintiff:
Ralph K Freeman
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc and William Henry Walker, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Wilkerson v. City of Chattanooga, Tennessee et al
as 1:2009cv00168
Plaintiff:
Cary L. Wilkerson and Cary L. Wilkerson
Defendant:
City of Chattanooga, Tennessee, Ron Littlefield, Chattanooga Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Goodine v. City of Chattanooga et al
as 1:2009cv00050
Defendant:
City of Chattanooga, Freeman Cooper, Bobby Dodd and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence F Goodine
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Freeman v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 2:2009cv00011
Plaintiff:
Debra F Freeman
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Walker v. City of Chattanooga et al
as 1:2009cv00026
Plaintiff:
William Henry Walker, Sr.
Defendant:
City of Chattanooga, Kenneth Freeman and Edwin McPherson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Robinson v. Freeman
as 3:2008cv00488
Plaintiff:
Connie D. Reaves Robinson
Defendant:
Dennis S Freeman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Walls v. Taylor et al
as 4:2008cv00087
Plaintiff:
Terry Walls
Defendant:
Gene - Taylor, Steve Graves, Pam Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
