Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Hale v. Cook et al
as 1:2016cv00106
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hale
Defendant:
Doug Billy Cook, Derrick D Schofield, Jason Woodall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale v. Cook et al
as 1:2016mc00028
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hale
Defendant:
Doug Billy Cook, Derrick D Schofield, Jason Woodall and others
Cage v. Schofield et al
as 2:2015cv00162
Plaintiff:
Quinton Albert Cage
Defendant:
Derrick D Schofield and Herbert B Slatary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunn v. Schofield et al
as 3:2015cv00201
Plaintiff:
Joshua P Dunn
Defendant:
Derrick D Schofield, David Sexton and J Woodal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kirchner v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2014cv00063
Plaintiff:
Kyle Kirchner
Defendant:
State of Tennessee , Tennessee Department of Correction , Derrick D Schofield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Mason v. Schofield et al
as 3:2013cv00357
Plaintiff:
Anton Tamir Mason
Defendant:
Derrick D Schofield, David Sexton, Doug Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthews v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2012cv00318
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Reynolds Matthews
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Corrections, Derrick D Schofield, Charles Traughber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Avery v. Haslam et al
as 2:2012cv00367
Plaintiff:
David Avery
Defendant:
William Bill Haslam, Derrick D Schofield, David A Sexton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duvall et al v. The State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2011mc00023
Plaintiff:
Randy J Duvall and Beverly Warren
Defendant:
The State of Tennessee, Tennessee Department of Corrections, Derrick D Schofield and others
Duvall et al v. The State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2011cv00512
Plaintiff:
Randy J Duvall and Beverly Warren
Defendant:
The State of Tennessee, Tennessee Department of Corrections, Derrick D Schofield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
