Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
McFarland v. Hawk et al (JRG1)
as 1:2020cv00286
Plaintiff:
Jennifer McFarland
Defendant:
Charles A Hawk, Christopher S Thompson and TVA
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Smith v. Marion County, Tennessee et al (TV2)
as 1:2020cv00165
Defendant:
James H Hawk and Marion County, Tennessee
Plaintiff:
William Terry Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkes v. Chattanooga Choo Choo
as 1:2020cv00127
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Hawkes
Defendant:
Chattanooga Choo Choo and Chattanooga Choo Choo doing business as Choo Choo Partners, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hawk v. U.S. Xpress, Inc. et al (TV3)
as 3:2019cv00164
Defendant:
U.S. Xpress, Inc., U.S. Xpress Leasing, Inc, U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry C Hawk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Willis v. Finney et al
as 2:2019cv00019
Defendant:
Lisa Dee Rice, Steven R Finney, Dennis Dwayne Brooks and others
Plaintiff:
Howard Hawk Willis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Hawkings County Justice Center
as 2:2016mc00004
Petitioner:
Norman F Wright
Respondent:
Hawkings County Justice Center
Hawk v. Hospital of Morristown, Inc., et. al. (JRG1)
as 2:2015cv00343
Plaintiff:
Amy Hawk
Defendant:
Hospital of Morristown, Inc. , Michael I Mossman and Professional Account Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United Community Bank v. Smokey Mountain Spring Water, LLC et al
as 3:2012cv00638
Plaintiff:
United Community Bank
Defendant:
Smokey Mountain Spring Water, LLC, David P. Hawk and NB White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
