Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Lacy v. Pounds
as 2:2024cv00022
Petitioner:
Anthony Lacy
Respondent:
Zac Pounds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lacy v. Davis et al (TV2)
as 2:2023cv00117
Plaintiff:
Anthony Joseph Lacy
Defendant:
Buddy Davis, Josh Davis, Michael Arnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lacy v. Riverbend Maximum Security Institution
as 2:2022cv00040
Petitioner:
Anthony J. Lacy
Respondent:
Riverbend Maximum Security Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lacy v. Carter County Sheriffs Office et al
as 2:2021cv00145
Plaintiff:
Anthony Joseph Lacy
Defendant:
Carter County Sheriffs Office, James Parrish, Mike Parrish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kagley et al v. Nandan, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00458
Plaintiff:
Ronda Henderson and Lacie Kagley
Defendant:
Nandan, Inc. and Magnuson Worldwide, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00240
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Lacy v. Fritts
as 2:2015cv00238
Plaintiff:
Anthony Joseph Lacy
Defendant:
Roby Fritts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lacy v. Carter County Sheriff's Office et al (ASH)
as 2:2015cv00035
Plaintiff:
Anthony J. Lacy
Defendant:
Carter County Sheriff's Office, Dexter Lunsford and Brian Fritts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Milstead v. Bedford County Sheriff's Department et al
as 4:2012cv00052
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Milstead
Defendant:
Bedford County Sheriff's Department, Mike Randalls, Robert Crigler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
The Peoples Bank v. Lacy et al
as 3:2011cv00297
Plaintiff:
The Peoples Bank
Defendant:
Raymond E. Lacy , Lacy, Price & Wagner, P.C., and Summit Title Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
