Cases 31 - 40 of 219
Adkins et al v. Spurlock et al
as 3:2021cv00863
Plaintiff:
James L. Adkins, Jr. and Adam Robert Williams
Defendant:
Bill Spurlock and Does 1 - 100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 3:2021cv00435
Plaintiff:
Patrice McCaulley, Debra Bales, Philip Spence and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00430
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wells v. Davidson County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2021cv00369
Defendant:
Davidson County Sheriff's Office, Julius Higgins and Cameron Gernert
Plaintiff:
Adam Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mageo v. Mays et al
as 3:2021cv00216
Defendant:
Tony Mays, Mark Gomez, Courtney Hudson and others
Plaintiff:
Simanu Mageo, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 3:2021cv00158
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Timothy Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Otter Products, LLC et al v. A&C Business Enterprises, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00111
Plaintiff:
Otter Products, LLC and Treefrog Development, Inc.
Defendant:
A&C Business Enterprises, LLC doing business as Gimme $5, Adam Harrington doing business as Gimme $5, John Does 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00058
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell et al v. Adams et al
as 3:2020cv01080
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc. d/b/a Lyft Tennessee, Inc., Lyft, Inc. and Asia Adams
Plaintiff:
Tuesday Campbell and Delbert Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Lindsey v. Collier et al
as 2:2020cv00062
Defendant:
Lewis Collier, Willard Greene, Chase Halliburton and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Linsdey and Mark Lindsey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
