Cases 41 - 50 of 94
Burley v. Sumner County 18th Judicial Drug Task Force
as 3:2019cv00118
Plaintiff:
Ivan Antjuan Burley
Defendant:
Sumner County 18th Judicial Drug Task Force, Officer Jason Arnold, Sumner County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gladden v. Sotherland et al
as 1:2018cv00081
Defendant:
Judge Barbara Medley and Gunnar Sotherland
Plaintiff:
James Gladden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burns v. Helper et al
as 3:2018cv01231
Defendant:
Kim R. Helper, State of Tennessee, Timothy L. Easter and others
Plaintiff:
Vermaine M. Burns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Cannistra v. Rodriguez et al
as 1:2018cv00078
Defendant:
Jo Anne Palchak, Judge Ralph C. Storrard and R. Kevin Rodriguez
Plaintiff:
Joseph Cannistra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amadi v. Tinkham Auto Sales et al
as 3:2018cv00840
Defendant:
Judge Barry Tidwell, Mike J. Urquhart and Tinkham Auto Sales
Plaintiff:
Paul E. Amadi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stanton et al v. Tennessee et al
as 3:2018cv00824
Plaintiff:
Juan LaSean Perry and Jacob Stanton
Defendant:
Tennessee and Judge John Wooten, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rolston et al v. Tennessee Government, State of et al
as 3:2018cv00656
Plaintiff:
Robert Rolston and Catherine R. Dunlap-Rolston
Defendant:
Ashley N. Duvall, The Metropolitian Government and Nashville and Davidson County, Paul Walwyn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Farmer v. Munkeboe et al
as 3:2017cv01356
Defendant:
Carolyn Piphus, Harold Dean Haney, Bill Haslam and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Lemont Farmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gardner v. Morriss et al
as 3:2017cv00811
Plaintiff:
David Gardner
Defendant:
Dent Morriss, Mike Jones, Glenn Funk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maisano v. Core Civic et al
as 3:2017cv00614
Plaintiff:
Dale Maisano
Defendant:
Core Civic, Arizona, State of, Charles Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
