Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Jackson v. Diligence Corporation et al
as 2:2023cv02761
Plaintiff:
Terry Jackson
Defendant:
Diligence Corporation, Cedric Chism and Keshanti Chism
Scanlan et al v. Bonner et al
as 2:2023cv02164
Plaintiff:
Michael Scanlan, Nedaal Hamud, Travis Lewis and others
Defendant:
Floyd Bonner, Shelby County Jail Division, Lee Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudson v. City of Memphis et al
as 2:2021cv02547
Plaintiff:
Mateem Malik Hudson
Defendant:
City of Memphis, Tennessee, Inc., CoreCivic, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barbaro v. 42 U.S.C. 654(3) Child Support Divsion et al
as 2:2020cv02177
Defendant:
42 U.S.C. 654(3) Child Support Divsion, Debra Sanders, Sheldon Y. McCall and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Barbaro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chism v. The Robertson Company, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv02033
Defendant:
Dutsin Whitson, The Robertson Company, LLC, Unique Insurance Company and others
Undetermined:
Temiika Gipson
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Chism
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chism v. Ford et al
as 2:2018cv02737
Defendant:
Officer Ford, Sheriff Odom, Shelby County Jail Administrator and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Chism
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. City of Memphis/Shelby County & Criminal Court, et al
as 2:2017cv02432
Plaintiff:
Rhakim Martin
Defendant:
City of Memphis/Shelby County & Criminal Court, Mary Thomas, Amy Weirich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herron v. Wright et al
as 2:2017cv02159
Defendant:
Raquel Hatter , Greg Wright , Lige Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Herron
Miscellaneou:
Donna Russell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Chism v. Batts
as 2:2016cv02639
Petitioner:
Eric Chism
Respondent:
Myron Batts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Chism v. United States of America et al
as 2:2016cv02145
Movant:
Eric Chism
Respondent:
United States of America and Myron Batts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
