Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Owens v. TN Dept of Corrections
as 1:2024cv01069
Plaintiff:
Roderick M Owens
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Corrections, Linda R. Thomas, Ricky Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Negrete-Neal v. Luraschi et al
as 2:2024cv02285
Plaintiff:
Rheta Negrete-Neal
Defendant:
Anthony Luraschi, Apperson Crump, PLC, Timothy Ginski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Owens et al v. Hill et al
as 1:2024cv01096
Plaintiff:
Roderick M Owens and Dwayne Jordan
Defendant:
Ricky Hill, FNU Watkins, f/n/u Gross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01074
Plaintiff:
Christine Williams
Defendant:
CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC, CoreCivic LLC, Alexie Pruitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neal v. Copart of Tennessee, Inc.
as 2:2021cv02631
Plaintiff:
Katie Neal
Defendant:
Copart of Tennessee, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hyneman v. AutoZone, Inc.
as 2:2021cv02427
Plaintiff:
Neal Hyneman
Defendant:
AutoZone, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NEAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. D/B/A BULLET PROOF DIESEL v. Mike's Bulletproof Diesel et al
as 1:2021cv01023
Plaintiff:
Neal Technologies, Inc. doing business as Bullet Proof Diesel
Defendant:
Mike's Bulletproof Diesel and Mike Lewis
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Neal v. Mohon et al
as 2:2020cv02832
Defendant:
Kelley Lynne Mohon and Richard Dee Mohon
Plaintiff:
Ethel B. Neal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Masciarella v. Newhouse et al
as 1:2020cv01206
Defendant:
FNU Newhouse, FNU Killingsworth, Trina Neal and others
Plaintiff:
Wayne Gary Masciarella
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cherry et al v. Cherry
as 2:2020cv02532
Plaintiff:
W. Neal Cherry, Darrell K. Cherry and Philip A. Cherry
Defendant:
G. Douglas Cherry, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
