Cases 11 - 20 of 471
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Prescott (PS) v. Hopkins et al
as 6:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Anthony Prescott
Defendant:
Terrie Hopkins, Tanya Hudnall, Ron Steffa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Prescott (PS) v. Hicks et al
as 6:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Anthony Prescott
Defendant:
Tiara Hicks, Debora A. Adams, Andrew C. Brazeal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bossier v. Belinsky et al
as 1:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Gerard J. Bossier
Defendant:
Andrew Belinsky, J & N Trucking Unlimited, Inc. and Andrew Michael Belinsky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
McMillan v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00038
Petitioner:
Andrew McMillan
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Heath v. Horton et al
as 2:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
Billy . Horton, Kaleh Adams and Kentrell Andrews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Warden, USP Beaumont
as 1:2024cv00018
Petitioner:
Andrew Scott Wilson
Respondent:
Warden, USP Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Cartwright v. State Of Texas
as 6:2023cv00547
Petitioner:
Ira Andrew Cartwright
Respondent:
State Of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cartwright v. State Of Texas
as 9:2023cv00201
Petitioner:
Ira Andrew Cartwright
Respondent:
State Of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
