Cases 11 - 20 of 65
Wilson et al v. Austin III et al
as 4:2022cv00438
Plaintiff:
Joshua A Wilson, Members of the Armed Forces for Liberty, Michael Groothousen and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Scott Wells, Annmarie Acevedo, William Timothy Adams and others
Defendant:
Lloyd J. Austin III, Acting Commissioner Janet Woodcock, Xavier Becerra and others
Amicus Curiae:
Pritish Vora
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Carr v. Kirkland et al
as 2:2022cv00108
Plaintiff:
Willie Tyrone Carr
Defendant:
Michael Kirkland and Brad Morin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Carr v. LA Boring LLC
as 6:2022cv00133
Plaintiff:
Jason Carrr and Jason Carr
Defendant:
LA Boring LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Miller v. Carr
as 5:2021cv00139
Plaintiff:
John A Miller
Defendant:
Nick Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carr v. Boyd
as 2:2021cv00405
Petitioner:
Willie Ty'rone Carr
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Miller v. Carr et al
as 5:2021cv00127
Plaintiff:
John A Miller
Defendant:
Nick Carr and Franklin County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
England v. Bush et al
as 9:2021cv00274
Plaintiff:
Michael England
Defendant:
James E. Bush, Kyler B. Franklin, Arturo A. Dominguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spencer v. Selgas et al
as 6:2021cv00347
Counter Defendant:
George Spencer
Counter Claimant:
Tom Selgas and Antonio Savarese
Defendant:
Matthew Everett and Greg Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Carr v. Rayford
as 2:2021cv00127
Respondent:
J Rayford
Petitioner:
Willie Ty'rone Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Carr Enterprises Inc v. Acadia Insurance Company
as 6:2021cv00129
Plaintiff:
Carr Enterprises Inc. d/b/a ABC Printingc and Carr Enterprises Inc doing business as ABC Printing
Defendant:
Acadia Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
