Cases 31 - 40 of 161
Monk v. Turn Key Medical et al
as 5:2021cv00146
Plaintiff:
Everick L. Monk
Defendant:
Turn Key Medical, FNU Phipps, FNU Hillhouse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tradesol Group Ltd. v. Vplus Co. et al
as 2:2021cv00388
Plaintiff:
Tradesol Group Ltd.
Defendant:
Vplus Co., Nguyen Duy Hoat and John Doe 1-25
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Lancaster et al v. Murray et al
as 4:2021cv00724
Plaintiff:
Kenneth A. Lancaster and Carol D. Lancaster
Defendant:
Nathan A. Murray, Stayko Dimitrov Staykov, Bradley Ward Edmondson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Adams v. Gonzalez et al
as 1:2021cv00405
Plaintiff:
Cleveland Thor Adams
Defendant:
R Gonzalez and John Doe 1-6
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wellness Program Services, LLC d/b/a Trusii v. H2 Beverages, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00580
Plaintiff:
Wellness Program Services, LLC d/b/a Trusii
Defendant:
H2 Beverages, Inc., Kurt H. Ruppman Sr., Shelli Ruppman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parmeley v. Titus County Jail et al
as 5:2021cv00061
Defendant:
Jane Doe 1, Captain Price, John P. Livingston and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Parmeley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. U.S. Xpress, Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv00048
Defendant:
John Does (1-5) and U.S. Xpress, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Shannon Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00304
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Alexander v. Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00236
Defendant:
John Does 1-25 and Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
Plaintiff:
Summer Alexander
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Greathouse v. Southwestern Correctional, LLC, d/b/a LaSalle Corrections, LLC et al
as 5:2021cv00002
Defendant:
John Does 1-10, City of Texarkana, Texas, Tiffany Hill and others
Plaintiff:
Miracle Ann Greathouse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
