Cases 61 - 70 of 88
King v. Kent et al
as 1:2012cv00605
Plaintiff:
Vernon King, Jr
Defendant:
James H Kent, Anthony Moreno, A Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shackelford v. Jenkins et al
as 6:2012cv00923
Plaintiff:
Karl Lynn Shackelford
Defendant:
Sonya Jenkins, Diana Browing, Doug Phillipps and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jenkins v. Yin Investments USA, LP et al
as 6:2012cv00654
Plaintiff:
Ran Malone Jenkins
Defendant:
Yin Investments USA, LP , TJ Union Cafe, LP , Danny Powell, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jenkins et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2012cv00170
Plaintiff:
Lawrence C. Jenkins , Melvin D. Snoody and Rickie L. Williams
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Bingham v. Owens et al
as 6:2012cv00099
Plaintiff:
Wesley Allen Bingham
Defendant:
Rissie Owens, Stuart Jenkins, Sharon Perkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
The Estate of Ennis Jenkins et al v. City of San Augustine et al
as 1:2011cv00546
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Ennis Jenkins , Ellis L Jenkins , E L Jenkins and others
Defendant:
City of San Augustine, County of San Augustine, Gary Fountain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conklin v. Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 6:2011cv00450
Plaintiff:
David Conklin
Defendant:
Director TDCJ-CID, Stuart Jenkins, Management Training Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. City of Palestine, Texas et al
as 6:2011cv00331
Plaintiff:
David Burl Parker
Defendant:
City of Palestine, Texas and Jeremy Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Pitman
as 1:2011cv00183
Plaintiff:
William Jenkins, III
Defendant:
William Pitman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2011cv00176
Plaintiff:
Kathy Diana Jenkins
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
