Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Ratcliff v. State of Texas et al
as 9:2021cv00246
Plaintiff:
Elijah W Ratcliff
Defendant:
State of Texas, Greg Abbott, Elizabeth Coker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. $326,800.00 in United States currency et al
as 4:2017cv00491
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$326,800.00 in United States currency, $13,773.09 from Bank of America account x1630, $11,100.00 from J.P. Morgan Chase account x1747 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Liu v. Flowers Davis, PLLC et al
as 4:2017cv00263
Plaintiff:
Hao Liu
Defendant:
Flowers Davis, PLLC , Harrison & Hull, LLP , Sulphur Springs City of and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Ware v. Hawthorn et al
as 1:2016cv00489
Petitioner:
Ulysses T Ware
Respondent:
Zack J Hawthorn, Marcia A Crone, David A O'Toole and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Ratcliff v. State of Texas et al
as 9:2015cv00106
Plaintiff:
Elijah White Ratcliff
Defendant:
State Of Texas, City of Livingston, Texas, LHR, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
MacLeod v. Culver et al
as 4:2015cv00239
Plaintiff:
Barry Macleod
Defendant:
Michael Culver and Hull Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
Macleod v. Culver et al
as 4:2014cv00550
Plaintiff:
Barry Macleod
Defendant:
Michael Culver and Hull Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Datatreasury v. Fiserv, Inc.
as 2:2013cv00431
Plaintiff:
DataTreasury Corporation
Defendant:
Fiserv, Inc., Citizens 1st Bank, East Texas Financial Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Hull et al v. Ness et al
as 4:2010cv00153
Plaintiff:
Bryan Hull and The Clay Company Incorporated
Defendant:
Steven Ness, Transglobal Development LLC, Lakeview Downs Equestrian, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
v. Hull et al
as 4:2010cv00152
Defendant:
Bryan Hull and Clay Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
