Cases 21 - 30 of 296
Brawley v. The City of Dallas, Texas et al
as 3:2022cv01257
Plaintiff:
Michelle Louise Brawley
Defendant:
The City of Dallas, Texas, Department of Family and Protective Services, Troya Farris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Brooks v. Nelson Cruz & Associates LLC
as 3:2022cv01123
Plaintiff:
Tracy Brooks
Defendant:
Nelson Cruz & Associates LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Nelson v. Cottonwood Financial Texas LLC
as 1:2022cv00045
Plaintiff:
Tina Castle Nelson
Defendant:
Cottonwood Financial Texas LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615 Family and Medical Leave
Nelson v. Cottonwood Financial Texas LLC
as 3:2022cv00932
Plaintiff:
Tina Castle Nelson
Defendant:
Cottonwood Financial Texas LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615 Family and Medical Leave
Huezo-Felipe v. Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company et al
as 3:2022cv00863
Plaintiff:
Jose Huezo-Felipe
Defendant:
Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company and Rasheika Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00038
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00039
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nelson v. Straughn et al
as 5:2021cv00312
Plaintiff:
Michael B. Nelson
Defendant:
Captain NFN Straughn, Wesley Hendrix, Bobby Lumpkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Udoh v. Garland et al
as 3:2021cv03006
Plaintiff:
Uduak Nelson Udoh
Defendant:
Merrick B Garland, Department of Homeland Security, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Nelson v. C/O Baker et al Administration
as 5:2021cv00297
Petitioner:
Michael B.E. Nelson
Respondent:
C/O Baker et al Administration and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
