Cases 41 - 50 of 101
Hernandez v Holmes et al
as 5:2021cv00115
Respondent:
Elbert Holmes and Director, TDCJ-CID
Interested Party:
Ken Paxton
Petitioner:
Rocky Hernandez and Rocky Sebastian Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hernandez v Holmes et al
as 2:2021cv00086
Respondent:
Elbert Holmes
Interested Party:
Ken Paxton
Petitioner:
Rocky Hernandez and Rocky Sebastian Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Avdeef v. US Department of Justice et al
as 4:2021cv00451
Defendant:
Texas Governor Greg Abbott, Patrick W. Powers, Judge Don Cosby and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen M Avdeef
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Council v. Battle et al
as 3:2021cv00613
Defendant:
Jane/Joe Doe2, Joe Doe, Craig Watkins and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Council
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smart v. Paxton
as 4:2021cv00433
Plaintiff:
Wesley Brandon Smart
Defendant:
Ken Paxton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bekendam v. State of Texas et al
as 3:2021cv00577
Defendant:
Christine Harmon, Kimberly Gray, Wichita County District Clerk and others
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Bekendam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mejia v. State of Texas
as 3:2021cv00237
Petitioner:
Carlos Mauricio Izagui Mejia and Carlos Mauricio Izaguirre Mejia
Respondent:
State of Texas doing business as Kathy Kahle doing business as Kristine M Guiney doing business as Marillyn Burgess doing business as Ken Paxton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Young v. Paxton
as 4:2020cv00839
Defendant:
Ken Paxton
Plaintiff:
Huguette Nicole Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Collier et al
as 2:2020cv00183
Respondent:
Bryan Collier, Teresia Coker and Ken Paxton
Petitioner:
LaVonte Dewayne Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman et al v. Brozen et al
as 3:2020cv01358
Petitioner:
Jason Coleman and Jessica Casey
Respondent:
Neil M. Brozen, Vasilia Peterson, Robert Peterson, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
