Cases 1 - 10 of 77
Drake v. FedEx Ground Package System Inc
as 3:2024cv00571
Plaintiff:
Eric Drake
Defendant:
FedEx Ground Package System Inc, Molly Smith, Arthur William Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
White v. The State of Texas et al
as 4:2023cv00925
Plaintiff:
Jacob White
Defendant:
The State of Texas, The City of Grapevine, Bruno Rumbelow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Blanton v. Owens et al
as 3:2023cv00077
Plaintiff:
Donald Gene Blanton
Defendant:
Priscilla R Owens, Jennifer Elrod Walker, Edith Brown Clement and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Laster v. Boyle et al
as 3:2022cv01913
Plaintiff:
Shermaine Laster
Defendant:
Jane Boyle, Judge Renee Harris Toliver, Rebecca Rutherford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coulter v. Chief Judge Lynn et al
as 3:2022cv01384
Plaintiff:
Braylon Ray Coulter
Defendant:
Chief Judge Lynn, Magistrate Judge Toliver, John Boyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Laster v. Boyle et al
as 3:2021cv02525
Plaintiff:
Shermaine Laster
Defendant:
Jane J Boyle, Melanie Smith, FBI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00668
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyle v. Wilson et al
as 4:2021cv00232
Plaintiff:
Dennis Boyle
Defendant:
S. Williams, Eric Wilson and B.P. Waller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blanton v. Solis et al
as 3:2021cv00291
Plaintiff:
Donald Gene Blanton
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID, Jane J Boyle, Irma Carrillo Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Boyle et al
as 3:2020cv03654
Defendant:
Irma Carillo, Sam Cummings, Jane J Boyle and others
Plaintiff:
Lowell Quincy Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
