Cases 11 - 20 of 88
Todryk v. Randolph-Brooks Federal Credit Union
as 1:2021cv00842
Plaintiff:
William Todryk
Defendant:
Randolph-Brooks Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693
Mach v. Solutia, Inc. Employees' Pension Plan
as 1:2021cv00810
Plaintiff:
Randolph Mach
Defendant:
Solutia, Inc. Employees' Pension Plan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00998
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Reposa v. Chody et al
as 1:2019cv01110
Plaintiff:
Adam T. Reposa
Defendant:
Robert Chody, Nicole Warren, Williamson County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. U.S. Air Force et al
as 5:2019cv01107
Defendant:
Department of Labor (Dallas, TX), Randolph AFB (San Antonio, TX), Department of Labor (Washington, DC) E.C.A.B. and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Joe Robinson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv01037
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Mach v. OneMain Financial Services, Inc.
as 1:2019cv00628
Plaintiff:
Randolph Mach
Defendant:
OneMain Financial Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Osherow v. Adams et al
as 1:2019cv00050
Plaintiff:
Randolph M. Osherow solely and in his capacity as Chapter 7 Trustee of KLD Energy Technologies, Inc. and Randolph M. Osherow
Defendant:
Mark Wabschall, Christian Okonsky, Mark W. Wabschall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Shockome et al v. Brendel et al
as 1:2018cv01103
Plaintiff:
E. A., Yevgenia Shockome and V. A.
Defendant:
Tara Randle, Robert Brendel, Kyle Cowand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jennifer Garcia v. Randolph-Brooks Federal Credit Union et al
as 5:2018cv00978
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Garcia
Defendant:
Randolph-Brooks Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
