Cases 41 - 50 of 250
Callier v. Morality Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00207
Plaintiff:
Brandon Callier
Defendant:
Morality Inc., Joshua Cacho, Veritas Legal Plan, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Nicholas v. Thompson et al
as 1:2021cv00726
Plaintiff:
Melvin Nicholas
Defendant:
Trey Thompson, John Does 1-6 and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Callier v. EBF Partners, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00180
Plaintiff:
Brandon Callier
Defendant:
EBF PARTNERS, LLC, d/b/a EVEREST BUSINESS FUNDING, Scott Crockett and John Does 1-4
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Hanson v. O'Daniel et al
as 1:2021cv00629
Plaintiff:
Ryan Andrew Hanson
Defendant:
Patrick O'Daniel, Cris Love, Kim Massey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Callier v. Bitty Advance 2, LLC. et al
as 3:2021cv00158
Plaintiff:
Brandon Callier
Defendant:
Bitty Advance 2, LLC., MCA Servicing, LLC., Craig Hecker and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Wise v. Bexar County et al
as 5:2021cv00541
Plaintiff:
Nicole Wise
Defendant:
Javier Salazar, Bexar County and John Does #1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Vega v. City of El Paso et al
as 3:2021cv00116
Defendant:
Officer Luis A Martinez #3149, City of El Paso, John Does 1 Through 10 and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Vega
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Watson et al
as 6:2021cv00510
Defendant:
Sheriff Rodney Watson and John Does 1-3
Plaintiff:
Gary Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hudnall et al v. Smith et al
as 3:2021cv00106
Plaintiff:
Sharon Elias Hudnall and Robert K. Hudnall
Defendant:
Kurt G. Paxson, Guy Bluff, Evanston Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Arnold et al v. Allied Van Lines, Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv00438
Defendant:
Sirva Relocation, LLC, Coleman American Moving Services, Inc., Allied Van Lines, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Linda Arnold and Michael Arnold
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
