Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Riggs, Sr. v. Lumpkin et al.
as 7:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
James Tyrone Riggs, Sr
Defendant:
Director Bobby Lumpkin, Chairman David G. Gutierrez, Parole Boardmember Elodia Brito and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Gutierrez et al
as 5:2024cv00279
Plaintiff:
Jose Flores Hernandez
Defendant:
David G. Gutierrez, Eric J.R. Nichols, Governor Greg Abbott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Provino v. Wray et al
as 3:2023cv00213
Plaintiff:
Raphael M. Provino
Defendant:
Christopher Wray, Jeffrey E. Church, John Richards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Calton v. Gutierrez et al
as 1:2021cv00846
Plaintiff:
Allen F. Calton
Defendant:
David G. Gutierrez, James La Favers, Carmella Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fletcher v. Thielke et al
as 1:2021cv00337
Defendant:
Carol M. Garcia, Carmella Jones, J.J. Lopez and others
Plaintiff:
Jamie Fletcher, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freddie Lee Walker v. Bobby Lumpkin, TDCJ
as 5:2020cv01288
Respondent:
Bettie Louise Wells, David G. Gutierrez and Major Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
Freddie Lee Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FILING ERROR
as 1:2020cv00831
Defendant:
Board member Anthony Ramirez, Board member David G. Gutierrez, Board member Chuck Speier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia v. Collier - TDCJ Director et al
as 1:2020cv00515
Defendant:
David G. Guitierrez, Anthony Ramirez, Chuck Speier and others
Plaintiff:
Narciso N Garcia, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Moore
as 1:2020cv00508
Plaintiff:
David G. Scott
Defendant:
Margaret Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Moore et al
as 1:2020cv00287
Respondent:
Travis County District Attorney's Office and Margaret Moore
Petitioner:
David G. Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
