Cases 11 - 20 of 51
Meyers v. Robinson et al
as 2:2020cv00523
Defendant:
Sgt. Ms. Dial, A. David Robinson, Daniel McGowan and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meyers v. Gilmore et al
as 2:2020cv00444
Defendant:
Ofc. Cornelius Bland, Joseph Walters, QMHP - Ms. Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brumfield v. Eppes et al
as 1:2020cv00386
Defendant:
Anita Schlank, Jane Doe, Nathan Moore and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Curtis Brumfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saunders v. Turner et al
as 1:2020cv00007
Plaintiff:
Jerod Saunders
Defendant:
Ms. Ellen Turner, Ms. Jenkins and Ms. Epps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cummins-Reed v. Eppes et al
as 1:2019cv01463
Defendant:
Ms. T. Eppes and Jason Wilson
Plaintiff:
John Cummins-Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Gay et al
as 2:2019cv00179
Defendant:
Epps and Gay
Plaintiff:
Ervin D. Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Epps v. Holocomb
as 3:2019cv00163
Defendant:
Richard D. Holocomb
Plaintiff:
Ra'Shonda Epps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ghaffari v. The Bank of New York Mellon et al
as 1:2018cv01291
Defendant:
M. Richard Epps, P.C. and The Bank of New York Mellon
Plaintiff:
Mahnaz Ghaffari
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Christian, on behalf of himself and those similarly situated present and former employees of Defendants v. Family and Child Empowerment Services et al
as 4:2018cv00055
Plaintiff:
Andre B. Christian, on behalf of himself and those similarly situated present and former employees of Defendants
Defendant:
Family and Child Empowerment Services, Inc. and Dr. Lillie Grant-Epps
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Epps et al v. Scaffolding Solutions, LLC
as 2:2017cv00562
Plaintiff:
Tony Epps , MATTHEW SULLIVAN, For themselves and on behalf of all others similarly situated , Mike Wall and others
Defendant:
Scaffolding Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
