Cases 21 - 30 of 47
Hill v. Hull et al
as 1:2014cv01062
Plaintiff:
Mashama Hill
Defendant:
Ted Hull, Daryl Turner, Joseph Hickey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilford v. Hull
as 1:2014cv01007
Petitioner:
Richard Anthony Wilford
Respondent:
Ted Hull
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SIMS v. United States Parole Commission et al
as 3:2014cv00046
Petitioner:
Kristopher Sims
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission, United States Marshal's Service, Federal Bureau of Prison's and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01572
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carter v. Ulep et al
as 1:2013cv01425
Plaintiff:
Jacori Andre Carter
Defendant:
Benjamin Ulep, Lt. William, Officer Wells and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthews v. Hull et al
as 1:2013cv00450
Plaintiff:
Alexander Otis Matthews
Defendant:
Ted Hull , R. Michelle Lewis , Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Real Property and Improvements Known as 20 Sanford Ferry Court, Fredericksburg, Virginia 22406 et al
as 1:2013cv00414
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Real Property and Improvements Known as 20 Sanford Ferry Court, Fredericksburg, Virginia 22406, Real Property and Improvements Known as 1030 John Paul Jones Drive, Stafford, Virginia 22554, $646,729.01 from the sale of Real Property and Improvements known as PH1-10, 1010 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Forfeiture
Simmons v. Hull
as 1:2012cv00254
Petitioner:
Eric Simmons
Respondent:
Hull
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wall v. Baserap et al
as 3:2012cv00093
Plaintiff:
Gerald Wall
Defendant:
Baserap, Edward Hull and D. Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wagoner v. Hull et al
as 2:2012cv00022
Plaintiff:
Robert Wagoner
Defendant:
Mr. Hull and Mrs. Neil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
