Cases 31 - 40 of 1,263
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Williams v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00080
Petitioner:
Shawn P. Williams
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Porter v. Lampman et al
as 1:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Tremaine Porter
Defendant:
P. Lampman, R. Langford and Joshua Branch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Mason v. Booth et al
as 1:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Akeem C. Mason
Defendant:
Booth, Wesley Townsend and P. Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
UNITED STATES v. 0.1785 acres of land, more or less, situate in Chesapeake, Virginia et al
as 2:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
MSF Investors II, LLC, Arcadia Equity Associates, City Of Chesapeake and others
Hubbard v. Tiller
as 2:2024cv00013
Petitioner:
Gerald Wayne Hubbard
Respondent:
Craig P. Tiller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
