Cases 51 - 60 of 93
Minetree v. Bogley et al
as 1:2015cv01694
Plaintiff:
Sally Minetree
Defendant:
Hilleary Bogley, Lane Phillippe, Mary Tarr and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1345
Lane, Jr. v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 1:2015cv01543
Plaintiff:
Dewaune Lamont Lane, Jr.
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Commonwealth of Virginia v. Minetree
as 1:2015cv01428
Plaintiff:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Defendant:
Sally Minetree
Counter_defendant:
Hilleary Bogley, Lane Phillippe, Mary Tarr and others
Counter_claimant:
Sally Minetree
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Martin v. Perry
as 3:2015cv00627
Plaintiff:
James Martin
Defendant:
Lane Perry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rashid v. The Lane Construction Corporation
as 3:2015cv00615
Plaintiff:
Margaret Rashid
Defendant:
The Lane Construction Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown et al v. Transurban USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00494
Plaintiff:
Jo-Ann Brown , Mary Elise Pizarro and Michele Osborne
Defendant:
Transurban USA, Inc. , Transurban Drive, USA LLC , Capital Beltway Express, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Roland v. Maggie L. Walker Governor's School Regional School Board et al
as 3:2015cv00228
Plaintiff:
Grady E. Roland
Defendant:
Maggie L. Walker Governor's School Regional School Board , James F. Lane, Ed.D. and Jeff McGee, Ph.D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Custis v. Davis et al
as 2:2015cv00142
Plaintiff:
Ryricka Nikita Custis
Defendant:
Keith Davis, S. Evans, M. Woodruff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane, Jr. v. Mullen et al
as 1:2014cv01259
Plaintiff:
Dewune Lane, Jr.
Defendant:
Cherisse Mullen, Anton Bell, Bonnie L. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Lane et al
as 3:2014cv00613
Plaintiff:
Kyle D. Smith
Defendant:
Lt. Lane, Sgt. Hill and Ofc. Power
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
