Cases 61 - 70 of 86
Curtis v. Newton
as 1:2013cv00601
Petitioner:
Derek Curtis
Respondent:
Colonel Newton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Meyers v. Armistead et al
as 2:2013cv00222
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
L. Armistead, B. Gray, R. Caulderon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Negron-Bennett et al v. McCandless et al
as 1:2013cv00387
Plaintiff:
Luz Denise Negron-Bennett and Salim A. Bennett
Defendant:
Jason Lee McCandless, Arlington County Office of the County Attorney, Arlington County Commonwealth's Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wyatt v. Newton et al
as 1:2013cv00267
Plaintiff:
Kippy L. Wyatt, Jr.
Defendant:
Jeffrey Newton, M. Reynolds and Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Atkinson v. Abbossi et al
as 1:2013cv00071
Plaintiff:
William Roger Atkinson
Defendant:
Abbossi, Claiborne, Newton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown-El v. Newton
as 3:2013cv00008
Petitioner:
Tina Brown-El
Respondent:
Jeffrey L. Newton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Meyers v. Newton
as 3:2012cv00857
Petitioner:
David Meyers
Respondent:
Jeffery L. Newton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00554
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Employment (Wrongful Termination)
Cook v. Newton et al
as 3:2012cv00631
Plaintiff:
Tyrone R. Cook, Sr.
Defendant:
Jeffery Newton and Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Braxton Sr. v. Cole et al
as 1:2012cv00758
Plaintiff:
Brian Omar Braxton Sr.
Defendant:
Cole, Harris, Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
