Cases 1 - 10 of 289
Phoenix v. Dotson, et al
as 3:2024cv00625
Defendant:
David Robinson, Dana Watson, Darrell Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel W. Phoenix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kauffman v. Unknown
as 3:2024cv00611
Defendant:
Unknown
Plaintiff:
Brandon Watson Kauffman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Dotson
as 1:2024cv01037
Petitioner:
Edward L. Watson and Leonard Watson
Respondent:
Chadwick K. Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bingham v. Shaw et al
as 1:2024cv01034
Defendant:
Julie Lillrose Churchill, Monique Watson Donner, Matthew Beyra and others
Plaintiff:
Ta'Kuan Bingham and Ta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Watson et al.
as 1:2024cv00991
Defendant:
Jamal L. Thomas, St. Brides Correctional Center, VitalCore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Watson et al
as 1:2024cv00990
Defendant:
St. Brides Correctional Center and Ms. D. Watson
Plaintiff:
Jamal L. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson-Buisson v. Dotson
as 1:2024cv00603
Petitioner:
Jeremy Lee Watson-Buisson and Jeremy Leigh Watson-Buisson
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. Watson et al
as 2:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Lindsey Antonio Wilson
Defendant:
D. Watson, K. Knolls, Ms. Gomes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mickens v. Ayyar et al
as 1:2024cv00381
Plaintiff:
Janece Mickens
Defendant:
Balan Ayyar, Tom Watson and David Goldberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Assault, Libel, Slander
Dedes v. Paige et al
as 3:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
Christos D. Dedes
Defendant:
Rosewell Paige, John H. O'Brion, Jr., James Watson Morris, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
