Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Gentry v. Unknown
as 2:2023cv00187
Petitioner:
Timothy Gentry
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Drayton v. Lee et al
as 1:2022cv00892
Plaintiff:
Michael Louis Drayton
Defendant:
Manuel Lee, Brice Gentry and Lago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gentry et al v. Virginia Hospital Center Arlington Health System et al
as 1:2020cv01018
Plaintiff:
Wayne Johnson and Jaye Gentry
Defendant:
Virginia Hospital Center Physician Group, LLC, Virginia Hospital Center Arlington Health System, Rupali K. Singh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986
Harper v. Harper et al
as 3:2018cv00510
Defendant:
Stephen R. Bloomquest, Esq., Joy C. Gentry, Lacey Simpson McKinnon and others
Plaintiff:
Guy Roderick Harper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sluss v. Gentry et al
as 2:2018cv00077
Plaintiff:
Matthew Sluss
Defendant:
Raymond Gentry and Burnie Borden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gentry v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv00766
Plaintiff:
Devion Gentry
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Corrections, Nottoway Correctional Center, A. David Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adam Gentry v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv02726
Defendant:
Lumber Liquidators, Inc. and Lumber Liquidators Holdings, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Adam Gentry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gentry v. Samuels et al
as 3:2014cv00279
Plaintiff:
Sharon O'Dell Gentry
Defendant:
Charles Samuels, E. D. Wilson, Buklich and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Strouse v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2012cv00653
Petitioner:
James Strouse
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons, E. D. Wilson, Bernardo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
