Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Monks v. SeaWorld Parks & Entertainment, LLC
as 4:2020cv00101
Plaintiff:
Susan E Monks
Defendant:
SeaWorld Parks & Entertainment LLC d/b/a SeaWorld Parks, LLC and SeaWorld Parks & Entertainment LLC doing business as Busch Gardens Willliamsburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Monk v. Gulick et al
as 3:2020cv00518
Defendant:
Donald W Gulick, Jr, Brian Anderson, Lucas C Curtis and others
Plaintiff:
James E Monk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00595
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Carter v. Harvey et al
as 3:2010cv00715
Plaintiff:
Leonard Carter, Jr.
Defendant:
A. P. Harvey, Y. M. Taylor, J. Combs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Farrakhan v. Johnson et al
as 1:2010cv00924
Plaintiff:
Shaka Amir Farrakhan
Defendant:
Gene Johnson, J. Jabe, Stevens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. The Crestar Bank Employees et al
as 1:2010cv00172
Plaintiff:
Benjamin H. Jones
Defendant:
The Crestar Bank Employees, A. Curtis Monk, Marilyn Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Farrakhan v. Johnson et al
as 1:2009cv00178
Plaintiff:
Shaka Amir Farrakhan
Defendant:
Gene Johnson, Eric Madsen, Duncan Mills and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Podhorn v. Angelini et al
as 3:2007cv00416
Plaintiff:
Paul E. Podhorn, Jr.
Defendant:
Chris Angelini, Scott Finley, B. True and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question Bivens-Prisoner
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
