Cases 1 - 10 of 126
Meyers v. Rosch et al
as 2:2024cv00348
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Kyle Rosch, Chadwick Dotson, S. Soloman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Bowens et al
as 3:2024cv00299
Plaintiff:
Demond Williams
Defendant:
Officer Bowens, Officer MakanJuda, Officer Jeffers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (National Origin)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Sweeting v. Mack et al
as 2:2023cv00679
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Sweeting
Defendant:
Captain Mack, Captain Bagwrath, Captain Finley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neal v. Greensville Correctional Center
as 1:2023cv00696
Petitioner:
Dai'Shawn Marquis Neal
Respondent:
Greensville Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fedynich v. Shaw et al
as 3:2023cv00229
Defendant:
Yvonne Farmer, Anton Shaw, Vonnie and others
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Fedynich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Neal v. Clarke
as 1:2023cv00448
Petitioner:
Daishawn Neal and Hamza Abjullaah Nassir Neal
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Religion)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
