Cases 1 - 9 of 9
SLUSS v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 2:2023cv00185
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW DAVID SLUSS
Defendant:
US DEPT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruhren v. Dept of Justice et al
as 1:2023cv00495
Plaintiff:
Joseph Ruhren
Defendant:
Dept of Justice, SA Shane D. Dana, SA Preston Bosch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Dickson v. U.S. Department of Justice Attorney General of the U.S.A. Mrs. Loretta E. Lynch et al
as 4:2015cv00121
Plaintiff:
John M. Dickson, Jr.
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice Attorney General of the U.S.A. Mrs. Loretta E. Lynch, Mr. Eric Holder Former Attorney General of the U.S.A. of Covington & Burling LLP, U.S. Dept of Justice U.S. Attorney Eastern District, Virginia Mr. Dana J. Boente and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00719
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Bussie v. McDonnel et al
as 2:2015cv00089
Petitioner:
Anthony Bussie
Respondent:
Robert "Bob" McDonnel, Maureen McDonnel, State of Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Belt v. DEA et al
as 1:2014cv01151
Plaintiff:
Tariq Liyuen Adevemi Belt
Defendant:
DEA, DEA Chief Information Officer, DEA Baltimore Field Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question Bivens-Prisoner
Kinney et al v. U.S. Dept. Of Justice et al
as 1:2009cv00806
Plaintiff:
Darryl Kinney and Jada Kinney
Defendant:
U.S. Dept. Of Justice, I.R.S. and State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Huff v. U. S. Dept. of Justice, Civil Rights Division
as 3:2008cv00516
Petitioner:
Johnny R. Huff
Respondent:
U. S. Dept. of Justice, Civil Rights Division
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
