Cases 1 - 10 of 375
Chandler v. Warden and Officers
as 3:2024cv00626
Plaintiff:
Chauncey D. Chandler
Defendant:
Warden and Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01509
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Riggins v. Dotson et al
as 3:2024cv00596
Defendant:
Director Chadwick S. Dotson and Warden Rodney Younce
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Lamar Riggins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chandler v. Abingdon Regional Jail et al
as 3:2024cv00579
Defendant:
Abingdon Regional Jail, Major Warden and Lt Wilson
Plaintiff:
Chauncey Chandler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Varner v. Leu et al
as 3:2024cv00566
Defendant:
Warden Leu, Captain Rosencrance, Jane Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Darrell Varner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Scott v. Leu et al
as 2:2024cv00430
Defendant:
Jane Doe 4, John Doe 3, John Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Hosea Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question Bivens-Prisoner
Meyers v. Bailey
as 2:2024cv00360
Defendant:
Warden Mack Bailey
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lee v. Stanton et al
as 3:2024cv00395
Defendant:
Reg. Administrator Adrian Tucker, Warden Larry T. Edmonds and D. Stanton
Plaintiff:
Gilford Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. WARDEN - Lawrenceville Correctional Center
as 1:2024cv00826
Plaintiff:
Tamir A. Wilson
Defendant:
WARDEN - Lawrenceville Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nealy v. Warden of MCTC et al
as 2:2024cv00291
Petitioner:
Michael Nealy
Respondent:
Warden of MCTC, Maryland Attorney General and Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
