Cases 141 - 150 of 25,179
Gill v. Whatnot, Inc.
as 7:2024cv00299
Plaintiff:
Alexandra Gill
Defendant:
Whatnot, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Krishchenko et al v. Crosspointe Conference Ctr. et al
as 7:2024cv00295
Plaintiff:
Yelena Krishchenko and Nikolay Krishchenko
Defendant:
Crosspointe Conference Ctr., Joey Lyons and LTR Property Management
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Mosier v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 1:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Kevin V. Mosier
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Smith v. Corbin et al
as 7:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wayne Smith
Defendant:
Superintendent Clay Corbin, Captain H. Custer, A. Kovak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. United States of America
as 6:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Barry G. White
Defendant:
Christopher M. Cummings and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Linton v. Trump et al
as 7:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
David Linton
Defendant:
Donald Trump and MAGA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Owens et al
as 7:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
Wilbert Smith
Defendant:
R. Owens, B. Dotson, T. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caruthers v. Rockingham Regional Jail Medical Department et al
as 7:2024cv00291
Plaintiff:
William H. Caruthers
Defendant:
Rockingham Regional Jail Medical Department, Officer Perez, Officer Morbin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manougian v. Calixte et al
as 3:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Ara Manougian
Defendant:
Hans M. Calixte and Lolo Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
