Cases 1 - 10 of 28
White v. West et al
as 7:2024cv00545
Defendant:
Tonya Chapman and Patricia West
Plaintiff:
Oadis William White, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chapman v. Lewis et al
as 7:2024cv00497
Defendant:
C/O Watkins and Sgt. Lewis
Plaintiff:
Saquon T. Chapman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitfield et al v. Page County Fire & EMS et al
as 5:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Maeghan Kisling, Odessa Meade, Blake Brooking and others
Defendant:
Page County Fire & EMS and County of Page, Virginia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Chapman v. O'Malley
as 3:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Chapman
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Walsh v. MicroGEM US Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00069
Plaintiff:
Martin J. Walsh
Defendant:
MicroGEM US Inc., Jeff Chapman, Brad Neilley, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Chapman v. Google LLC
as 5:2022cv00027
Plaintiff:
Duane Chapman
Defendant:
Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Cruz et al v. Chapman et al
as 5:2021cv00072
Plaintiff:
Zachary Cruz, Micheal Donovan and Richard Moore
Defendant:
Duane Lee Chapman, Lyssa Chapman, David Bayre Briggman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
BLM Of The Shenandoah Valley, LLC et al v. Smith et al
as 5:2021cv00060
Plaintiff:
BLM Of The Shenandoah Valley, LLC, Cameron Turley, Bonnie Jo Chapman and others
Defendant:
Donald L. Smith, Timothy Martin and Augusta County, VA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCall v. Chapman et al
as 7:2021cv00181
Plaintiff:
Ronald McCall
Defendant:
Sherman Lea, Clarke, Kemba Smith Pradia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00105
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
