Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Wilburn et al v. Chance
as 1:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Benny R. Wilburn and Christie R. Wilburn
Defendant:
Kyle Chance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Scarborough v. Wiley et al
as 5:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
Christie Scarborough
Defendant:
William "Bill" Wiley and Susan Shick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scarborough v. Daniel et al
as 5:2023cv00008
Plaintiff:
Christie Scarborough
Defendant:
Mary Daniel, Nicholas Hager and Frederick County of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Saunders v. Kijakazi
as 7:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
Christy Saunders
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rivers v. Wynne et al
as 6:2022cv00034
Defendant:
Bank of the James Financial Group Inc., John Wynne, James Wynne and others
Plaintiff:
Crystal VL Rivers
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Wilburn et al v. Chance
as 2:2022cv00009
Plaintiff:
Benny R. Wilburn and Christie R. Wilburn
Defendant:
Kyle Chance
Respondent:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Neville v. Ballad Health System, Inc. et al
as 7:2022cv00242
Plaintiff:
Montario Neville
Defendant:
Ballad Health System, Inc., Jonathan Clark, Christy G. McGhee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boes et al v. Jones et al
as 2:2022cv00005
Plaintiff:
Carolee Boes, Kymberly L. Boes, Paulina J. Deal and others
Defendant:
Sheila Jones, Kay Vivian Barger, Michael Carrico and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Scarborough v. Frederick County Public Schools et al
as 5:2020cv00069
Defendant:
Does 1-10, Frederick County Public Schools and Steve Edwards
Plaintiff:
Christie Scarborough
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Caudill v. Saul
as 7:2020cv00268
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Christy N. Caudill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
